Key result
ECG signals obtained from a sensor-equipped steering wheel demonstrated quality inline with a benchmark chest ECG device, allowing for extraction of average and instantaneous heart and breathing rates.
Why the study?
Acquiring ECG signals during driving is challenging due to movement artifacts and electrode contact issues, but physiological monitoring could help reduce crashes caused by driver status and behaviors.
Does a sensor-equipped steering wheel accurately measure driver heart and breathing rates compared to a benchmark chest ECG device?
Does a sensor-equipped steering wheel accurately measure driver heart and breathing rates compared to a benchmark chest ECG device?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A sensor-equipped steering wheel can non-intrusively and accurately monitor a driver's heart and breathing rates, potentially aiding in the prevention of automobile crashes due to driver impairment.
Driver's status and behaviours such as inattention, drunk driving, or sleeping while driving play important roles in approximately half of all automobile crashes. For this reason, the last decade has seen an emergence of non-intrusive driver status monitoring systems with the ultimate goal of reducing the number of such accidents. From the different number of proposed methods, the use of the physiological signals, specifically the electrocardiogram (ECG), has shown useful. The acquisition of ECG signals during driving, however, presents a challenge due to movement artifacts, such as car and driver motion, and a good contact of the sensing electrodes, e.g., embedded on the driver seat. In this paper, we evaluate the ECG signals acquired from electrodes placed on the steering wheel under three aspects: (i) quality of the acquired signals; (ii) their usability to estimate an average and an instantaneous heart rate, and (iii) their usability to estimate the driver's breathing rate via innovative spectrotemporal processing of the acquired signals. Experimental results show that ECG signals obtained from the steering wheel have quality inline with that obtained from a benchmark chest ECG device, allow for both average and instantaneous heart rate to be measured, as well as breathing rate to be extracted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cassani et al. (2019) studied Driver status monitoring. ECG signals acquired from electrodes placed on the steering wheel vs. Benchmark chest ECG device was evaluated on Quality of acquired signals and usability to estimate heart and breathing rates. ECG signals obtained from a sensor-equipped steering wheel demonstrated quality inline with a benchmark chest ECG device, allowing for extraction of average and instantaneous heart and breathing rates.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: