Key result
Diabetes increases cardiovascular risk, driven by oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation.
This review highlights the complex interplay of hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, epigenetics, and inflammation in driving accelerated atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.
May guide multifactorial risk management in diabetes; leaves open targeted therapies against oxidative stress and inflammation for clinical testing.
Cardiovascular diseases are the most prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The proposed mechanisms that can link accelerated atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular risk in this population are poorly understood. It has been suggested that an association between hyperglycemia and intracellular metabolic changes can result in oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Recently, epigenetic factors by different types of reactions are known to be responsible for the interaction between genes and environment and for this reason can also account for the association between diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The impact of clinical factors that may coexist with diabetes such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension are also discussed. Furthermore, evidence that justify screening for subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic patients is controversial and is also matter of this review. The purpose of this paper is to describe the association between poor glycemic control, oxidative stress, markers of insulin resistance, and of low-grade inflammation that have been suggested as putative factors linking diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matheus et al. (2013) conducted a review in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Diabetes was evaluated. Diabetes increases cardiovascular risk through mechanisms involving poor glycemic control, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and low-grade inflammation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: