Key result
A 45-second self-test using heart rate recovery features, sex, age, and height estimated maximal oxygen uptake with moderate accuracy (adjusted r2 0.59) and high repeatability.
Why the study?
Does a 45-second squat test with heart rate monitoring accurately estimate cardiorespiratory fitness compared to maximal oxygen uptake testing in healthy individuals?
Observational (n=81)
Yes
Does a 45-second squat test with heart rate monitoring accurately estimate cardiorespiratory fitness compared to maximal oxygen uptake testing in healthy individuals?
Effect estimate: Adjusted r2 0.59
p-value: p=<0.001
A simple 45-second self-administered squat test utilizing heart rate recovery features provides a moderately accurate and highly repeatable estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy individuals.
Cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) is a widespread essential indicator in Sports Science as well as in Sports Medicine. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for CRF based on a 45 second self-test, which can be conducted anywhere. Criterion validity, test re-test study was set up to accomplish our objectives. Data from 81 healthy volunteers (age: 29 8 years, BMI: 24.0 2.9), 18 of whom females, were used to validate this test against gold standard. Nineteen volunteers repeated this test twice in order to evaluate its repeatability. CRF estimation models were developed using heart rate (HR) features extracted from the resting, exercise, and the recovery phase. The most predictive HR feature was the intercept of the linear equation fitting the HR values during the recovery phase normalized for the height 2 (r 2 = 0.30). The Ruffier-Dickson Index (RDI), which was originally developed for this squat test, showed a negative significant correlation with CRF (r = -0.40), but explained only 15% of the variability in CRF. A multivariate model based on RDI and sex, age and height increased the explained variability up to 53% with a cross validation (CV) error of 0.532 L min -1 and substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.91). The best predictive multivariate model made use of the linear intercept of HR at the beginning of the recovery normalized for height 2 and age 2 ; this had an adjusted r 2 = 0. 59, a CV error of 0.495 Lmin -1 and substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.93). It also had a higher agreement in classifying CRF levels ( = 0.42) than RDI-based model ( = 0.29). In conclusion, this simple 45 s self-test can be used to estimate and classify CRF in healthy individuals with moderate accuracy and large repeatability when HR recovery features are included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sartor et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy individuals (n=81). 45-second squat test vs. Direct assessment of VO2max via cycle ergometer was evaluated on Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) estimation accuracy (Adjusted r2 0.59, p=<0.001). A 45-second self-test using heart rate recovery features, sex, age, and height estimated maximal oxygen uptake with moderate accuracy (adjusted r2 0.59) and high repeatability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: