Key result
Guide-wire obstructed CFR and FFR measurements showed a strong linear correlation (R2=0.99) with true pathophysiological values for both 0.35-mm and 0.46-mm wires during angioplasty.
Why the study?
Does the presence of a guide wire during angioplasty affect the measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease?
Observational
Does the presence of a guide wire during angioplasty affect the measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: R2=0.99
The presence of a guide wire during FFR and CFR measurements causes flow obstruction, but true values can be accurately calculated using derived linear correlation equations.
Derived equations may permit accurate CFR/FFR despite wire obstruction; leaves open whether this alters revascularization decisions.
Hemodynamic analysis was conducted to determine uncertainty in clinical measurements of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) over pathophysiological conditions in a patient group with coronary artery disease during angioplasty. The vasodilation-distal perfusion pressure (CFR-p(rh)) curve was obtained for 0.35- and 0.46-mm guide wires. Our hypothesis is that a guide wire spanning the lesions elevates the pressure gradient and reduces the flow during hyperemic measurements. Maximal CFR-p(rh) was uniquely determined by the intersection of measured CFR and calculated p(rh) of native and residual epicardial lesions in patients without microvascular disease, during angioplasty. Extrapolation of the linear curve gave a zero-coronary flow mean pressure (p(zf)) of approximately 20 mmHg and a corresponding p(rh) of 55 mmHg in the native lesions, which coincided with the level that causes ischemia in human hearts. On this linear curve, values of CFR and FFRmyo (pathophysiological condition) and CFRg and FFRmyog (in the presence of the guide wire) were obtained in native and residual lesions. A strong linear correlation was found between CFR and CFRg [CFR = CFRg x 0.689 + 1.271 (R2= 0.99) for 0.46 mm and CFR = CFRg x 0.757 + 1.004 (R2= 0.99) for 0.35 mm] and between FFRmyo and FFRmyog [FFRmyo = FFRmyog x 0.737 + 0.263 (R2= 0.99) for 0.46 mm and FFRmyo = FFRmyog x 0.790 + 0.210 (R2= 0.99) for 0.35 mm]. This study establishes a strong correlation between CFR and CFRg and between FFRmyo and FFRmyog, which could be used to obtain the true state of occlusion in the coronary artery during angioplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease. Guide-wire (0.35- and 0.46-mm) presence during measurement vs. True pathophysiological condition (without guide-wire) was evaluated on Correlation between measured (with guide wire) and true CFR and FFRmyo (R2=0.99). Guide-wire obstructed CFR and FFR measurements showed a strong linear correlation (R2=0.99) with true pathophysiological values for both 0.35-mm and 0.46-mm wires during angioplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: