Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional testing systems usually give students a score as their test result, but do not show them how to improve their learning performance. Researchers have indicated that students would benefit more if individual learning guidance could be provided. However, most of the existing learning diagnosis models ignore the fact that one concept might contain multiple knowledge levels with different degrees of difficulty, and hence students might be guided in an inefficient and ineffective way. In order to provide more precise learning guidance to individual students, the study described in this paper uses an enhanced concept–effect model for diagnosing students' learning problems and providing learning advice. The experimental results from a mathematics course have demonstrated the utility and effectiveness of this innovative approach. Keywords: computer‐assisted testingconcept–effect relationshipscomputer‐assisted learningconcept maplearning diagnosis Acknowledgements This study is supported in part by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under contract numbers NSC 98‐2511‐S‐024‐007‐MY3 and NSC 98‐2631‐S‐024‐001. Notes 1. P.G. Barker, 'On the nature of conceptualization', private online communication, 5 November 2009.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: