Key result
NCX 6550 significantly reduced thrombus size to 0.08 mg compared to 0.46 mg with vehicle in highly hypercholesterolemic mice, whereas pravastatin did not.
Why the study?
To compare the lipid-lowering, antithrombotic, and antiatherogenic properties of the nitric oxide-donating pravastatin derivative NCX-6550 with pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic mice.
Does NCX 6550 (nitropravastatin) improve antithrombotic and antiatherogenic outcomes compared to pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic mice?
Does NCX 6550 (nitropravastatin) improve antithrombotic and antiatherogenic outcomes compared to pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic mice?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A nitric oxide-donating derivative of pravastatin (NCX 6550) demonstrated superior antithrombotic and antiatherogenic effects compared to standard pravastatin in a highly hypercholesterolemic mouse model.
Aim of the present study was to compare the lipid-lowering, antithrombotic and antiatherogenic properties of NCX-6550, nitropravastatin, a nitric-oxide donating derivative of pravastatin, with those of pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic mice. LDL receptor-deficient mice (LDLR–/–) on a normal diet (ND) showed enhanced cholesterol levels as compared to wild type (WT) mice (6.8±1.2 mmol/L and 2.8±0.82 mmol/L, respectively). High fat diet (HFD) induced a large enhancement of cholesterolemia in LDLR–/– mice (23.7±5.7 mmol/L, p<0.0001 vs LDLR–/– ND and WT mice. Treatment with NCX 6550 (48 mg/kg), but not with equimolar pravastatin, reduced cholesterol in LDLR–/–HFD. Platelet adhesion to collagen under high shear rate (3000 sec–1) was significantly higher in LDLR–/– than in normal mice, and further enhanced in LDLR–/–HFD (-27%, p<0.0001 vs untreated). NCX 6550 (48 mg/kg), but not pravastatin, reduced platelet adhesion, especially in LDLR–/–HFD. U46619-induced platelet aggregation ex vivo was also inhibited by NCX 6550 (48 mg/kg) but not by the parent compound. Finally, photochemically-induced acute (1 hr) femoral artery thrombosis and delayed (21 days) intimal thickening was assessed. Thrombus size was larger in LDLR–/– on HFD than in normocholesterolemic mice (0.46±0.04 vs 0.18±0.08 mg) and it was reduced by NCX 6550 (48 mg/kg) (0.08±0.02 mg, p<0.0001), but not by pravastatin (0.4±0.01 mg p=NS). Intimal thickening was greater in hypercholesterolemic than in normal mice (I/M normal=0.53±0.16, LDLR–/–=1.1±0.15, LDLR–/–HFD=1.75 ±0.25). Both NCX 6550 and pravastatin reduced intimal thickening in normal (-95% and -74.5%, respectively) and LDLR–/– mice (-98% and -91%), while in strongly hyperlipidemic animals (LDLR–/–HFD) NCX 6550 was more effective than pravastatin (-98% vs -65%, p<0.0001). NCX 6550 shows greater antithrombotic and antiatherogenic activity than pravastatin in highly hypercholesterolemic mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Momi et al. (2022) studied Hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. NCX 6550 vs. Pravastatin (40 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was evaluated on Thrombus size (mg) in LDLR-/- HFD mice (p=<0.0001). NCX 6550 significantly reduced thrombus size to 0.08 mg compared to 0.46 mg with vehicle in highly hypercholesterolemic mice, whereas pravastatin did not.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: