Key result
Preprocedural atrial fibrillation frequency did not independently predict AF recurrence at 12 months after pulmonary vein antral isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF (P=0.194).
Why the study?
Does preprocedural AF frequency predict AF recurrence after PVAI in patients with symptomatic drug-refractory PAF?
Cohort (n=362)
Does preprocedural AF frequency predict AF recurrence after PVAI in patients with symptomatic drug-refractory PAF?
Preprocedural frequency of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation does not predict the risk of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein antral isolation, suggesting that sub-classifying PAF by frequency may not be clinically valuable for ablation outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frequency-based sub-classification of paroxysmal AF should not yet inform ablation decisions; leaves open its prognostic value in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) is a recommended treatment for symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). PAF naturally progresses toward persistent AF with an increase in the frequency and duration of AF. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the preprocedural AF frequency had an impact on the AF recurrence after PVAI in patients with symptomatic PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 362 consecutive patients (61.0 ± 9.8 years; 274 males) with drug-refractory PAF who underwent PVAI were included. The preprocedural frequency of PAF was daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly in 145 (40.1%), 112 (30.9%), 90 (24.9%), and 15 (4.1%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in any of the preprocedural variables between the four groups, except for the number of ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). PVAI was successfully performed in all patients. At 12 months after the initial procedure, 63.5% of the entire group of patients were free of AF recurrences without any AADs, respectively. A Cox regression multivariate analysis of the variables including the AF frequency, age, gender, duration of AF, presence of hypertension or structural heart disease, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and body mass index demonstrated that the AF frequency was not an independent predictor of AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure (P = 0.194). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the preprocedural AF frequency did not predict AF recurrence after PVAI in patients with PAF. From the clinical point of view, an additional AF classification based on the preprocedural AF frequency might not be valuable in patients undergoing PVAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=362). Preprocedural atrial fibrillation frequency vs. Comparison among daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly frequencies was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence after a single ablation procedure (p=0.194). Preprocedural atrial fibrillation frequency did not independently predict AF recurrence at 12 months after pulmonary vein antral isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF (P=0.194).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: