Key result
Rural residence shows no difference in hypertension prevalence compared to urban living in older adults.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the frequency of essential hypertension detection in individuals aged over 60 years in relation to socio-economic risk factors.
Do socio-economic risk factors affect the prevalence of hypertension in older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=582)
No
Do socio-economic risk factors affect the prevalence of hypertension in older adults?
Socio-economic factors such as marital status and profession have a modest impact on blood pressure levels in older adults, though overall hypertension prevalence remains high across both urban and rural settings.
Comparable hypertension prevalence in rural and urban older adults should not yet change practice; cross-sectional data leaves open socio-economic influences on blood pressure.
Purpose . To assess the frequency of detection of essential hypertension in persons aged over 60 years depending on the socio-economic risk factors. Material and Methods . A total of 582 people aged 60 to 70 years were studied. All participants were surveyed to determine the level of education, income, professional affiliation, and family composition. Statistical data processing was carried out using Statistica 6.0 software. The significance level for statistical hypothesis testing in the study was <0.05. Results and Discussion . Hypertension occurred in 87.2% of rural residents and in 84.6% of urban residents (p = 0.429). This condition was diagnosed in 82.7% of men and 86.1% of women (p = 0.339). Regression analysis showed that holding a managerial position was associated with an increase in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 3.1 mmHg (p = 0.013). Formal marriage or common-law marriage was associated with an increase in mean SBP by 2.4 mmHg (p = 0.034) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 2.2 mmHg (p = 0.002). Living in rural areas was associated with decreased mean DBP by 1.66 mmHg (p = 0.015). The prevalence rates of hypertension were 90.5% in widows and 73.7% in women who had never been married (p = 0.031). No statistically significant differences were found between men with different marital status; however, the maximum prevalence of hypertension was observed among divorced men; the minimum prevalence was observed among widowers. Conclusions . There was no difference in the frequency of detection of hypertension between urban and rural older adults. The highest prevalence of hypertension among women was observed in widows; the lowest prevalence was found in women who had never been married. Among men, the highest prevalence of hypertension was observed in divorced persons; the minimum prevalence was detected in widowers, but the difference was not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Цыганкова et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Essential hypertension (n=582). Rural residence vs. Urban residence was evaluated on Prevalence of essential hypertension (p=0.429). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension between rural (87.2%) and urban (84.6%) older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: