Key result
Vivid E95 reduces inter-observer variability for LVEF and GLS compared to older-generation systems.
Why the study?
Does a new-generation ultrasound imaging system improve image quality and reduce inter-observer variability in LVEF and GLS measurements compared to an older system in patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=308)
Single-blind
No
Does a new-generation ultrasound imaging system improve image quality and reduce inter-observer variability in LVEF and GLS measurements compared to an older system in patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography?
Newer-generation ultrasound systems significantly improve image quality and reduce inter-observer variability in the measurement of LVEF and GLS, which may impact clinical decision-making.
May support newer systems for more consistent LVEF/GLS in practice; leaves open effects on clinical decisions or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) play important roles in diagnosis and management of cardiac diseases. However, the issue of the accuracy and reliability of LVEF and GLS remains to be solved. Image quality is one of the most important factors affecting measurement variability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether improved image quality could reduce observer variability. METHODS: Two sets of three apical images were acquired using relatively old- and new-generation ultrasound imaging systems (Vivid 7 and Vivid E95) in 308 subjects. Image quality was assessed by endocardial border delineation index (EBDI) using a 3-point scoring system. Three observers measured the LVEF and GLS, and these values and inter-observer variability were investigated. RESULTS: -value, bias, 95% limit of agreement and intra-class correlation coefficient for Vivid 7 were comparable to those for Vivid E95. The % variabilities were significantly lower for Vivid E95 (5.3-6.5%) than those for Vivid 7 (6.5-7.5%). Regarding GLS, all observer variability parameters were better for Vivid E95 than for Vivid 7. Improvements in image quality yielded benefits to both LVEF and GLS measurement reliability. Multivariate analysis showed that image quality was indeed an important factor of observer variability in the measurement of LVEF and GLS. CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation ultrasound imaging system offers improved image quality and reduces inter-observer variability in the measurement of LVEF and GLS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagata et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (n=308). New-generation ultrasound imaging system (Vivid E95) vs. Old-generation ultrasound imaging system (Vivid 7) was evaluated on Inter-observer variability (% variability) of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). The new-generation ultrasound imaging system (Vivid E95) significantly reduced inter-observer variability for LVEF (5.3-6.5% vs 6.5-7.5%) and GLS compared to the older-generation system (Vivid 7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: