Validity typologies can enhance our understanding of quasi‐experiments, but they can also serve as blinders. We can go beyond the primary concerns of validity typologies by studying causal process and by being explicit about the reasoning that underlies our inferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melvin M. Mark (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: