Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of UrologyUrological Survey: Abstracts: Urinary Tract Infection1 Apr 1998Evaluation of Suspected Urinary Tract Infection in Ambulatory Women: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Office-Based Strategies H.C. Barry, M.H. Ebell, and J. Hickner H.C. BarryH.C. Barry More articles by this author , M.H. EbellM.H. Ebell More articles by this author , and J. HicknerJ. Hickner More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63668-1AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Evaluation of Suspected Urinary Tract Infection in Ambulatory Women: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Office-Based Strategies." The Journal of Urology, 159(4), pp. 1418–1419 Departments of Family Practice, Michigan State University, East Lansing and Michigan State University, Escanaba, Michigan.© 1998 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 159Issue 4April 1998Page: 1418-1419 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1998 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information H.C. Barry More articles by this author M.H. Ebell More articles by this author J. Hickner More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barry et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: