Why the study?
Does procainamide affect the rate dependent behavior of threshold current, VERP, and APD in dogs with chronic complete AV block?
Does procainamide affect the rate dependent behavior of threshold current, VERP, and APD in dogs with chronic complete AV block?
In dogs with chronic complete AV block, procainamide causes a rate-dependent increase in pacing threshold current, which is a major factor in the phenomenon of postrepolarization refractoriness.
May enhance postrepolarization refractoriness via rate-dependent thresholds in AV block models; leaves open human translation.
Normally, ventricular APD exceeds the VERP. However, under specific circumstances this relation may change and can become inverse. This phenomenon of postrepolarization refractoriness may be caused by a decrease in excitability. The threshold current (TC) for pacing has never been quantified as a possible explanation for these observations. Using a MAP pacing catheter in the right ventricular apex, the rate dependent behavior of TC, VERP, and APD before and after procainamide (dose 20 mg/kg in 10 min + 5 mg/min infusion) was determined in 17 dogs with chronic complete AV block. Initially, TC was determined with 0.1 mA accuracy. Using a pacing current of at least twice TC, VERP and APD showed a similar, rate dependent shortening for PCLs 800, 575, and 350 ms. Procainamide treatment led to an equal, rate independent VERP and APD increase: no post repolarization refractoriness. Subsequently, accuracy for TC determination was increased to 0.01 mA. Comparing PCLs 800 and 250 ms, TC doubled from 0.05 +/- 0.01 to 0.10 +/- 0.09 mA during control and almost tripled from 0.06 +/- 0.02 to 0.17 +/- 0.10 mA (P < 0.05) after procainamide. Using a fixed pacing current of exactly twice TC found at 800 ms PCL during control, VERP exceeded APD after procainamide treatment at 300 and 250 ms PCL: postrepolarization refractoriness. Increasing the pacing current to twice the rate dependent TC, the relation between VERP and APD normalized: no postrepolarization refractoriness. We conclude that after procainamide, rate dependent TC increase is of major importance for the phenomenon of postrepolarization refractoriness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LEERSSEN et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: