The diagnostic accuracy for imaging infection with a technetium-99m-labeled antigranulocyte Fab' fragment (LeukoScan) was prospectively examined in a multicenter study. Scintigraphy was performed in 53 patients at 1 to 6 hours and at 24 hours after injection of the labeled antibody fragment. Thirty-nine sites of infection were detected and confirmed by histologic study, cytologic study, other imaging procedures, or by followup. Thirty-eight of the 53 patients also were studied with technetium-99m-Exametazim or indium-111-oxine labeled leukocytes within 1 week of the LeukoScan study. In 21 patients with 25 osteomyelitic lesions, LeukoScan recognized 13 of the lesions as being true positive ones, 10 as being true negative ones, and 2 as being false negative ones, whereas the leukocyte scan showed 9 true positive results, 5 true negative results, and 2 false negative ones. Sensitivity specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of LeukoScan were 90.0 %, 84.6 %, and 87.9 %; and with autologous leukocyte scintigraphy were 83.9%, 76.5%, and 81.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of LeukoScan was independent of the amount of the labeled antibody injected (0.1 - < 0.5 mg, 96.2%; 0.5 - < 0.9 mg, 80.0%; 0.9 - 1.0 mg, 77.8%). False positive lesions were detected in a periprosthetic calcification, a frontal hyperostosis, and 2 periprosthetic hips that had loosened. Human antimouse antibody could not be detected in any of the 13 patients tested 1 or 3 months after injection. LeukoScan is suitable for imaging infectious lesions and may have diagnostic advantages compared with autologous leukocyte scintigraphy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becker et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: