Key result
Thoracic epidural anesthesia decreased the maximum slope of ventricular electrical restitution compared to baseline (0.70 vs. 0.89; P=0.021), reflecting improved electrical wave stability.
Why the study?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuate myocardial excitability and the proarrhythmic effects of sympathetic hyperactivity in a porcine model?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuate myocardial excitability and the proarrhythmic effects of sympathetic hyperactivity in a porcine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 0.89%
p-value: p=0.021
Thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuates ventricular myocardial excitability and improves electrical wave stability during sympathetic hyperactivity in a porcine model.
May attenuate sympathetic proarrhythmia in animal models; leaves open translation to human ventricular arrhythmia prevention.
BACKGROUND: Imbalances in the autonomic nervous system, namely, excessive sympathoexcitation, contribute to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. While thoracic epidural anesthesia clinically suppresses ventricular tachyarrhythmias, its effects on global and regional ventricular electrophysiology and electrical wave stability have not been fully characterized. The authors hypothesized that thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuates myocardial excitability and the proarrhythmic effects of sympathetic hyperactivity. METHODS: Yorkshire pigs (n = 15) had an epidural catheter inserted (T1 to T4) and a 56-electrode sock placed on the heart. Myocardial excitability was measured by activation recovery interval, dispersion of repolarization, and action potential duration restitution at baseline and during programed ventricular extrastimulation or left stellate ganglion stimulation, before and 30 min after thoracic epidural anesthesia (0.25% bupivacaine). RESULTS: After thoracic epidural anesthesia infusion, there was no change in baseline activation recovery interval or dispersion of repolarization. During programmed ventricular extrastimulation, thoracic epidural anesthesia decreased the maximum slope of ventricular electrical restitution (0.70 ± 0.24 vs. 0.89 ± 0.24; P = 0.021) reflecting improved electrical wave stability. Thoracic epidural anesthesia also reduced myocardial excitability during left stellate ganglion stimulation-induced sympathoexcitation through attenuated shortening of activation recovery interval (-7 ± 4% vs. -4 ± 3%; P = 0.001), suppression of the increase in dispersion of repolarization (313 ± 293% vs. 185 ± 234%; P = 0.029), and reduction in sympathovagal imbalance as measured by heart rate variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study describes the electrophysiologic mechanisms underlying antiarrhythmic effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia during sympathetic hyperactivity. Thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuates ventricular myocardial excitability and induces electrical wave stability through its effects on activation recovery interval, dispersion of repolarization, and the action potential duration restitution slope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard‐Quijano et al. (2017) studied Ventricular excitability and sympathetic hyperactivity (n=15). Thoracic epidural anesthesia vs. Baseline was evaluated on Maximum slope of ventricular electrical restitution during programmed ventricular extrastimulation (p=0.021). Thoracic epidural anesthesia decreased the maximum slope of ventricular electrical restitution compared to baseline (0.70 vs. 0.89; P=0.021), reflecting improved electrical wave stability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: