Key result
NT-proBNP-stratified screening detects new AF in ~4% of high-risk individuals.
Why the study?
To evaluate the prevalence of unknown AF in a high-risk 75/76-year-old population using NT-proBNP and handheld ECG recordings in a stepwise screening procedure.
Does NT-proBNP-stratified systematic screening improve the detection of untreated atrial fibrillation in 75/76-year-old individuals?
Cohort (n=6,868)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does NT-proBNP-stratified systematic screening improve the detection of untreated atrial fibrillation in 75/76-year-old individuals?
NT-proBNP-stratified systematic screening is a feasible strategy that effectively identifies high-risk older individuals with previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation who are receptive to oral anticoagulation.
Supports stepwise NT-proBNP and ECG screening for unknown AF in older adults; extends RCT evidence with high anticoagulation initiation rates.
AIMS: To study the prevalence of unknown atrial fibrillation (AF) in a high-risk, 75/76-year-old, population using N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and handheld electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings in a stepwise screening procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The STROKESTOP II study is a population-based cohort study in which all 75/76-year-old in the Stockholm region (n = 28 712) were randomized 1:1 to be invited to an AF screening programme or to serve as the control group. Participants without known AF had NT-proBNP analysed and were stratified into low-risk (NT-proBNP <125 ng/L) and high-risk (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L) groups. The high-risk group was offered extended ECG-screening, whereas the low-risk group performed only one single-lead ECG recording. In total, 6868 individuals accepted the screening invitation of which 6315 (91.9%) did not have previously known AF. New AF was detected in 2.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-3.0] of all participants without previous AF. In the high-risk group (n = 3766/6315, 59.6%), AF was diagnosed in 4.4% (95% CI 3.7-5.1) of the participants. Out of these, 18% had AF on their index-ECG. In the low-risk group, one participant was diagnosed with AF on index-ECG. The screening procedure resulted in an increase in known prevalence from 8.1% to 10.5% among participants. Oral anticoagulant treatment was initiated in 94.5% of the participants with newly diagnosed AF. CONCLUSION: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide-stratified systematic screening for AF identified 4.4% of the high-risk participants with new AF. Oral anticoagulant treatment initiation was well accepted in the group diagnosed with new AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gudmundsdottir et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=6,868). Stepwise screening for atrial fibrillation using NT-proBNP and handheld ECG was evaluated on Detection of new atrial fibrillation in high-risk participants (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L) (95% CI 3.7-5.1). N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide-stratified systematic screening identified new atrial fibrillation in 4.4% of high-risk participants and 2.6% of all screened participants without known AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: