Key result
Smart vest gyroscope outperforms accelerometer for resting HR estimation with ~0.4 bpm average error.
Why the study?
There is an increasing demand for wearable devices providing health information while meeting comfort needs during sports and physical activity.
Does a wearable smart vest with an IMU accurately estimate heart rate, respiratory rate, and pace cadence in volunteers during rest and exercise?
Does a wearable smart vest with an IMU accurately estimate heart rate, respiratory rate, and pace cadence in volunteers during rest and exercise?
A low-cost wearable smart vest using a single IMU (especially the gyroscope) can feasibly and accurately estimate heart rate, respiratory rate, and pace cadence during rest and exercise.
Gyroscope-based vests may enhance rest monitoring accuracy; leaves open larger validation trials before clinical adoption.
Monitoring physiological and biomechanical variables plays an important role in assessing human health in several scenarios, including sports. In this context, there is an increasing demand for wearable devices that can potentially provide heterogeneous information about the athlete’s health state, with the challenge of meeting the athlete’s needs in terms of comfort.In this paper, we propose a low-cost and unobtrusive wearable smart vest and a related adaptive algorithm to estimate both physiological variables such as heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) and the pace cadence. The sensing part of our smart vest consists of a single Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) embedding both an accelerometer (ACC) and a gyroscope (GYR) positioned on the thorax of the subject. Our device was tested on four volunteers during both at-rest postures, walking and running at different speeds. Results show that the GYR outperforms the ACC for both HR and RR estimation during at-rest postures taken up before performing the running exercise. Average Mean absolute error (MAE) values of 1.22 bpm and 0.39 bpm have been achieved for ACC and GYR in HR monitoring in the pre-exercise phase; Average MAE of 3.59 breaths/min and 0.36 breaths/min have been achieved for ACC and GYR in RR monitoring in pre-exercise phase. Also, after the exercise protocol, the results are very promising, with average MAE of 0.24 bpm and 0.25 bpm using ACC and GYR for HR estimation and up to 1.60 breaths/min and 0.15 breaths/min for ACC and GYR in RR monitoring, respectively. Moreover, the pace cadence estimated by our system matches all the protocol phases required for the volunteer. The obtained results support the feasibility of estimating HR, RR, and cadence by using the sensors inside the smart vest in daily life and sports activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romano et al. (2023) studied Vital signs and physical activity monitoring (n=4). Smart vest with IMU (accelerometer and gyroscope) and adaptive algorithm vs. Accelerometer vs Gyroscope was evaluated on Heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) estimation (Mean absolute error). A wearable smart vest using a gyroscope outperformed an accelerometer for estimating heart rate and respiratory rate, achieving average MAEs of 0.39 bpm and 0.36 breaths/min during pre-exercise rest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: