Key result
Mind-body medicine lowers SBP but not DBP versus conventional treatment in patients with CVD.
Why the study?
Available evidence on the effects of mind-body medicine techniques on blood pressure was inconclusive and provided conflicting results.
Do mind-body medicine techniques reduce blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=927)
Do mind-body medicine techniques reduce blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: SMD -0.78 (95% CI -1.36, -0.20)
p-value: p=0.01
Mind-body medicine interventions such as meditation and mindfulness may lower systolic blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease, though high heterogeneity limits the strength of this evidence.
May support mind-body interventions for systolic BP reduction in CVD; extends evidence but high heterogeneity leaves optimal use open.
Elevated blood pressure is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Available evidence on mind-body medicine (MBM) techniques on blood pressure is inconclusive and provides conflicting results. The objective of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of MBM techniques on blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease. Randomized control trials (RCTs) done between the years 2000 and 2020 on cardiovascular disease, using MBM techniques such as meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction and relaxation techniques were searched through electronic databases such as PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Three authors independently performed article selection, data extraction and validation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated for the effect size. Fifteen RCTs with 927 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among the studies was very high for all analyses (I2>94%). For studies comparing systolic blood pressure, MBM interventions show a significant (p=0.01) effect when compared to conventional treatment, an overall estimated effect size of SMD - 0.78 (95% CI: -1.36, -0.20). For studies comparing the diastolic blood pressure, MBM intervention did not show any significant effect when compared to the conventional treatment, an overall effect size of SMD -0.26 (95% CI: -0.91, 0.39). The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that MBM interventions may improve systolic blood pressure alone in patients with cardiac diseases. With high heterogeneity and low quality of the included studies, more robust evidence is required before suggesting MBM as an effective treatment modality for reducing blood pressure in cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wankhar et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular disease (n=927). Mind-body medicine (MBM) techniques vs. Conventional treatment, health education, waiting list, or routine care was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -1.36, -0.20, p=0.01). Mind-body medicine interventions significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.78) compared to conventional treatment in patients with cardiovascular diseases, but did not significantly affect diastolic blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: