Key result
A multidisciplinary approach incorporating input from various cardiology backgrounds is an important strategy in ensuring optimal outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.
Why the study?
Does a multidisciplinary care approach improve outcomes in patients with chronic systolic dysfunction receiving CRT devices?
Does a multidisciplinary care approach improve outcomes in patients with chronic systolic dysfunction receiving CRT devices?
Multidisciplinary care bridging heart failure and electrophysiology subspecialties is essential to optimize outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
INTRODUCTION: While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a mainstay in the management of selected patients with chronic systolic dysfunction, many patients are noted to experience less than expected or no benefit at all from the therapy. Multidisciplinary care has been shown to provide benefit in follow up for patients receiving CRT devices. Areas covered: This review will focus on the apparent reasons behind less than optimal outcomes following CRT as well as multidisciplinary approaches to treating patients with CRT devices. The literature review focused mainly on the data behind multidisciplinary care of CRT patients. Expert commentary: A multidisciplinary approach incorporating input from various cardiology backgrounds is an important strategy in ensuring optimal outcomes in patients receiving CRT devices. Breaking down the 'silo' effect amongst cardiac subspecialties is vital in achieving high level multidisciplinary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rickard et al. (2017) conducted a review in Heart failure with chronic systolic dysfunction receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Multidisciplinary care was evaluated. A multidisciplinary approach incorporating input from various cardiology backgrounds is an important strategy in ensuring optimal outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: