Analysis of survey data from 291 state legislative committee chairs suggests that professionalization has important gender implications not previously explored. Legislatures are gendered in the sense that culturally masculine and feminine committee management styles are more at home in some legislatures than in others. “Citizen” legislatures seem to be more hospitable to “feminine” behaviors of inclusion and a motivation focused on people‐oriented concerns. Professionalized legislatures–promoted in large part on the basis of a masculine vocabulary of independence, rationality, expertise, and competition with the executive–discourage inclusive or collegial committee strategies and public‐minded motives. Professional legislatures may be positive environments in which to nurture policy leadership, but their committee leaders eschew public participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cindy Simon Rosenthal (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: