Pathologic Basis of Disease

Rolla B. Hill

doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03350350139038

March 15, 1985JAMA

Pathologic Basis of Disease

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Examine the mid-twentieth-century pedagogical transition in pathology textbooks from static anatomical catalogs toward dynamic, cellular, and clinically oriented science.
Historical and comparative analysis of major twentieth-century pathology textbooks published during and after the 1930s and 1940s.
Evaluation of key curricular works, including texts by Sir Howard Florey, Wiley D. Forbus, William Boyd, and W. A. D. Anderson.
Early twentieth-century pathology education relied heavily on descriptive autopsy findings and static morbid anatomy rather than dynamic mechanisms.
Post-war texts introduced cell biology and physiological responses to injury, initiating a gradual pedagogical shift toward clinical integration.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Historical review traces the transition from static morbid anatomy to dynamic cellular science in pathology education, highlighting the shift toward clinical relevance.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Rolla B. Hill (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c875023b9c7180b2fe689 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03350350139038

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Pathologic Basis of Disease

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Pathologic Basis of Disease

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading