Key result
The mean qSOFA score was a stronger predictor of ICU mortality (OR 8.784) compared to the mean SOFA score (OR 7.738) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Why the study?
Sepsis and septic shock are common causes of ICU admission with high mortality, and this study aimed to validate the prognostic accuracy of SOFA and qSOFA in predicting mortality in both septic and non-septic patients.
Does qSOFA improve mortality prediction compared to SOFA in ICU patients with or without sepsis?
Cohort (n=180)
No
Does qSOFA improve mortality prediction compared to SOFA in ICU patients with or without sepsis?
Effect estimate: OR 8.784
p-value: p=<0.01
Both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of ICU mortality, but qSOFA demonstrated a closer predictive accuracy in this surgical ICU cohort.
qSOFA may predict ICU mortality better than SOFA in surgical patients; leaves open replacement of SOFA in routine practice.
Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to <79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values < 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basham et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Intensive Care Unit admission with or without sepsis (n=180). qSOFA score vs. SOFA score was evaluated on ICU mortality (OR 8.784, p=<0.01). The mean qSOFA score was a stronger predictor of ICU mortality (OR 8.784) compared to the mean SOFA score (OR 7.738) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: