Key result
Right ventricular septal pacing in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block narrowed the QRS duration from 160 ms to 110 ms and improved symptoms over 3 weeks.
Why the study?
Does high right ventricular septal pacing improve QRS duration and clinical response in a patient with heart failure and RBBB?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does high right ventricular septal pacing improve QRS duration and clinical response in a patient with heart failure and RBBB?
High right ventricular septal pacing may serve as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization in heart failure patients with right bundle branch block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant exploration in select HF with RBBB; leaves open confirmation versus biventricular pacing in trials.
A 71-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy, severe systolic left ventricular dysfunction and symptomatic heart failure was not considered a good candidate for implantation of a biventricular pacing system to effect cardiac resynchronization due to underlying right bundle branch block (RBBB). He received instead a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillation with the ventricular lead placed at an alternate site position at the high right ventricular septum. This resulted in significant narrowing of the QRS duration (resynchronization) with a good clinical response over short-term. The case illustrates a possible alternative approach to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization in patients with RBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manolis et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, right bundle branch block (n=1). Right ventricular septal pacing (paraHisian pacing) vs. Pre-procedural baseline was evaluated on QRS duration (ms). Right ventricular septal pacing in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block narrowed the QRS duration from 160 ms to 110 ms and improved symptoms over 3 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: