Key result
This protocol outlines a systematic methodological review to evaluate strategies used in exercise-related overviews to manage primary study overlap; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews can lead to overly precise pooled effect estimates in overviews, but strategies used to manage this overlap in exercise-related overviews have not been systematically described.
Systematic Review
This protocol outlines a systematic methodological review to describe strategies used by authors of exercise-related overviews to manage primary study overlap.
INTRODUCTION: One of the most conflicting methodological issues when conducting an overview is the overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews (SRs). Overlap in the pooled effect estimates across SRs may lead to overly precise effect estimates in the overview. SRs that focus on exercise-related interventions are often included in overviews aimed at grouping and determining the effectiveness of various interventions for managing specific health conditions. The aim of this systematic methodological review is to describe the strategies used by authors of overviews focusing on exercise-related interventions to manage the overlap of primary studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search strategy has been developed for different databases and their platforms. The databases to be consulted will be MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library) and Epistemonikos. Two reviewers will independently screen the records identified through the search strategy and extract the information from the included overviews. The frequency and the type of overlap management strategies of the primary studies included in the SRs will be considered as the main outcome. In addition, the recognition of the lack of use of any overlap management strategy and the congruence between planning and conducting the overview focusing on overlap management strategies will be assessed. A subgroup analysis will be carried out according to the journal impact factor, year of publication and compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not involve human subjects and therefore does not require ethics committee approval. However, the conduct and reporting of the findings of this review will be conducted in a rigorous, systematic and transparent manner, which relates to research ethics.The findings of this review will be presented at scientific conferences and published as one or more studies in peer-review scientific journals related to rehabilitation or research methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutiérrez-Arias et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Methodological review of exercise-related overviews. Strategies to manage overlap of primary studies was evaluated on Frequency and type of overlap management strategies of the primary studies included in the systematic reviews. This protocol outlines a systematic methodological review to evaluate strategies used in exercise-related overviews to manage primary study overlap; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: