Key result
Selective hs-cTn testing links to a ~5-fold higher PPV for type 1 MI over unselected testing.
Why the study?
Does patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing affect the positive predictive value for the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients?
Observational (n=8,500)
Clinicians blinded to high sensitivity assay results
Yes
Does patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing affect the positive predictive value for the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients?
Non-selective high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing in the emergency department yields a high rate of elevated results primarily due to myocardial injury, resulting in a low positive predictive value for type 1 myocardial infarction.
Patient selection lowers hs-cTn PPV in unselected cohorts; leaves open optimal thresholds and prospective validation before routine adoption.
When high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is performed widely or without previous clinical assessment, elevated troponin concentrations are common and predominantly reflect myocardial injury rather than myocardial infarction. These observations highlight how selection of patients for cardiac troponin testing varies across healthcare settings and markedly influences the positive predictive value for a diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=8,500). Patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing vs. Unselected testing was evaluated on Positive predictive value for type 1 myocardial infarction. Patient selection for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing markedly influenced the positive predictive value for type 1 myocardial infarction, which was 59.7% in conservatively selected UK patients versus 11.8% in unselected patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: