Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three Earth System models are used to derive surface temperature responses to removal of U.S. anthropogenic SO 2 emissions. Using multicentury perturbation runs with and without U.S. anthropogenic SO 2 emissions, the local and remote surface temperature changes are estimated. In spite of a temperature drift in the control and large internal variability, 200 year simulations yield statistically significant regional surface temperature responses to the removal of U.S. SO 2 emissions. Both local and remote surface temperature changes occur in all models, and the patterns of changes are similar between models for northern hemisphere land regions. We find a global average temperature sensitivity to U.S. SO 2 emissions of 0.0055 K per Tg(SO 2 ) per year with a range of (0.0036, 0.0078). We examine global and regional responses in SO 4 burdens, aerosol optical depths (AODs), and effective radiative forcing (ERF). While changes in AOD and ERF are concentrated near the source region (United States), the temperature response is spread over the northern hemisphere with amplification of the temperature increase toward the Arctic. In all models, we find a significant response of dust concentrations, which affects the AOD but has no obvious effect on surface temperature. Temperature sensitivity to the ERF of U.S. SO 2 emissions is found to differ from the models' sensitivity to radiative forcing of doubled CO 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conley et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: