Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the introduction of the EU emissions trading system on 1 January 2005, the EU became the world leader in the implementation of a market mechanism in environmental policy. Through the project-based Kyoto mechanisms, the EU trading scheme is linked to the world greenhouse gas market; however, the robustness of that link remains to be tested. Due to effective lobbying of large emitters, allocation is cost-free—either based on historical emissions (traditional ‘grandfathering’) or against projected emissions (which one might call ‘baseline-and-cap trading’)—and in most Member States the trading sectors have received a generous allocation. This may lead to a market with low liquidity and low prices. Nevertheless, the EU Commission has managed to reduce some of the more blatant cases of over-allocation. While the ongoing legal cases may lead to a temporary weakening of demand for allowances, a decision to expand the trading scheme to other sectors and gases, a larger role of auctioning as well as a more stringent post-2008 allocation plans process scheduled for 2006 may correct many of the first period's misconstructions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaelowa et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: