Ninety-two per cent of industrial fatal accidents in Hong Kong in 2021 were attributed to the construction industry. Previous construction safety culture studies focused on projects as a singular organisation. Studies in building projects from a multitier perspective merit further examination. This study develops a safety culture maturity (SCM) framework to assess (new) building projects in Hong Kong at three levels: Client Safety Culture (CSC), Main Contractor Safety Culture (MSC) and Subcontractor Safety Culture (SSC). A closed question survey (N-31) incorporating subculture constructs (Informed, Just, Reporting, Learning and Flexible Cultures) with Hudson’s safety culture ladder (Pathogenic, Reactive, Calculative, Proactive and Generative Cultures) is conducted. The findings reveal: CSC (Mean: 3.55, SD: 0.512), MSC (Mean: 3.71, SD: 0.311) and SSC (Mean: 1.90, SD: 0.605). Kruskal-Wallis One-Way-ANOVA shows that the mean maturity value of three organisations are unequal (χ² = 53.8, df: 2, p: < 0.001). A SCM framework is designed for (new) building projects related to near misses and accidents. It would not be applicable to health-related, workplace violence, burglary and accidents outside construction-related activities. This is the first study to examine the safety culture maturity at three organisational levels. The study recommends improving project-based SCM by intervening and aligning individual levels between CSC, MSC and SSC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eugene Chan (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: