Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Iris recognition has long been widely regarded as a highly accurate biometric despite the lack of independent large-scale testing of its performance. Recently, however, three third-party evaluations of iris recognition were performed. This paper compares and contrasts the results of these independent evaluations. We find that despite differences in methods, hardware, and/or software, all three studies report error rates of the same order of magnitude: observed false nonmatch rates from 0.0122 to 0.03847 at a false match rate of 0.001. Furthermore, the differences between the best performers' error rates are an order of magnitude smaller than the observed error rates.
Newton et al. (Wed,) studied this question.