Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a companion paper [Brown et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1385-1391 (1990)], a method for recording the electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential in human cochlear implant users was reported. The procedure for recording the response requires that two biphasic current pulses, a "masker" and a "probe," be presented at a rate and level sufficient to drive the auditory nerve into a refractory state. The present study was designed to assess the sensitivity of that recording technique to variations in stimulation parameters. The experiments described in this paper demonstrate that: (1) the EAP as recorded in the cat is triphasic and is defined by two negative peaks occurring at latencies of approximately 0.26 and 0.82 ms; (2) EAP amplitude is independent of the level of the masker stimulus for current levels equal to or greater than the current level of the probe stimulus; and (3) the time course of recovery of the EAP from the refractory state is stable over a range of both probe and masker current levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: