Why the study?
Head-to-head research evaluating the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA in patients with type 2 diabetes across different baseline renal function was lacking.
Does GLP-1RA compared to SGLT-2i improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus across different baseline renal functions?
Does GLP-1RA compared to SGLT-2i improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus across different baseline renal functions?
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the comparative efficacy of GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i on cardiovascular and renal outcomes varies significantly depending on baseline renal function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports eGFR-tailored GLP-1RA vs SGLT-2i selection in T2D; extends RCT meta-analyses to renal strata for mortality, HF, and kidney outcomes.
Finding no head-to-head research evaluating the cardiovascular and renal benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at different baseline renal function, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the two drugs indirectly. Systematic literature searches were conducted of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, covering their inception until 7 January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA in T2D with different glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were selected. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Finally, 10 RCTs involving 87,334 patients with T2D were included. In patients with an eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA exhibited a superior ability to reduce the risk of all-cause death compared with SGLT-2i (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58, 0.97), but it was less effective in reducing the risk of renal outcome (RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.15, 2.84) in patients with an eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, in patients with eGFR 30-60 and 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, GLP-1RA did not show an advantage in reducing the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (RR 1.87 [95% CI 1.15, 3.04] and 1.37 [95% CI 1.05, 1.78], respectively).
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: