This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Negishi cross‐coupling reaction of organozinc compounds as nucleophiles with aryl halides has drawn immense focus for C−C bond formation reactions. In comparison to the well‐established library of Pd complexes, the C−C cross‐coupling of this particular approach is largely primitive with nickel‐complexes. Herein, we describe the syntheses of Ni(II) complexes, [( Me BICAAC) 2 NiX 2 ] (X=Cl ( 1 ), Br ( 2 ), and I ( 3 )) by employing the bicyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene ( Me BICAAC) ligand. The reduction of complexes 1 – 3 using KC 8 afforded the two coordinate low valent, Ni(0) complex, [( Me BICAAC) 2 Ni(0)] ( 4 ). Complexes 1 – 4 have been characterized by spectroscopic techniques and their solid‐state structures were also confirmed by X‐ray crystallography. Furthermore, complexes 1 – 4 have been applied in a direct and convenient method to catalyze the Negishi cross‐coupling reaction of various aryl halides with 2,6‐difluorophenylzinc bromide or phenylzinc bromide as the coupling partner in the presence of 3 mol % catalyst. Comparatively, among all‐pristine complexes, 1 exhibit high catalytic potential to afford value‐added C−C coupled products without the use of any additive. The UV‐vis studies and HRMS measurements of controlled stochiometric reactions vindicate the involvement of Ni(I)−NI(III) cycle featured with a penta‐coordinated Ni(III)‐aryl species as the key intermediate for 1 whereas Ni(0)/Ni(II) species are potentially involved in the catalytic cycle of 4 .
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thakur et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: