Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and evaluate the bioequivalence of the fixed-dose combination Telzap Plus versus MikardisPlus in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.
Is Telzap Plus bioequivalent to MikardisPlus in healthy volunteers?
Is Telzap Plus bioequivalent to MikardisPlus in healthy volunteers?
Telzap Plus is bioequivalent to MikardisPlus in terms of pharmacokinetics for both telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide.
Permits interchangeable use of Telzap Plus and MikardisPlus; confirms bioequivalence in a replicate crossover RCT.
Introduction. A fixed dose combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide is indicated for treatment of in the treatment of arterial hypertension. The combination of these substances causes an additive effect that helps to reduce blood pressure. A bioequivalence study of Telzap ® Plus compared with MikardisPlus ® was conducted with 63 volunteers. Aim. The purpose of the bioequivalence trial was a comparative study of the pharmacokinetics and evidence of the bioequivalence of the fixed dose combination drug product Telzap ® Plus (tablets 80 mg + 12,5 mg, Zentiva KS company, Czech Republic) compared with drug products MikardisPlus ® (telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide, tablets 80 mg + 12,5 mg, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) in healthy volunteers after a single administration under fasting. Materials and methods. To prove bioequivalence, an open label, comparative, randomized, crossover fourperiod replicate single-center clinical trial was conducted. The concentrations of hydrochlorothiazide and telmisartan in plasma samples were determined with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. A pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis was performed and confidence intervals for the pharmacokinetic parameters C max and AUC 0-72 were calculated. Results and discussion. It can be concluded that the studied formulations are bioequivalent in terms of pharmacokinetic parameters of hydrochlorothiazide and telmisartan. All 90 % confidence intervals for the estimated pharmacokinetic parameters of hydrochlorothiazide were in the range of 80–125 %, 90 % confidence intervals for telmisartan were within the bioequivalence range of 80–125 % for AUC 0-72 , and 79,30–126,11 % for C max . Conclusion. Thus, according to the criteria used in the study, the formulations are proved to be bioequivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хохлов et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: