Why the study?
Obese patients have more coronary artery disease risk factors that may affect myocardial function, prompting an evaluation of echocardiography parameters to detect early dysfunction in obese individuals with almost no CAD risk factors.
Does high weight affect echocardiography-derived parameters of diastolic and systolic function in patients with cardiac syndrome X and no other cardiovascular risk factors?
Does high weight affect echocardiography-derived parameters of diastolic and systolic function in patients with cardiac syndrome X and no other cardiovascular risk factors?
In patients with cardiac syndrome X and no other cardiovascular risk factors, higher weight is associated with increased left atrial strain, though values remain within normal limits, suggesting minimal early impact on cardiac function.
Higher weight was associated with increased LA strain (still normal) in cardiac syndrome X; leaves open early adaptive changes, needing longitudinal studies.
Background Obese patients have more coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors that may affect myocardial function. We aimed to assess the ability of echocardiography‐derived conventional parameters, left atrial strain, and global longitudinal strain to detect early diastolic and systolic dysfunction in obese individuals with almost no CAD risk factors. Method We studied 100 participants with structurally normal hearts, ejection fractions above 50%, almost normal coronary arteries in coronary angiogram (syndrome X), and no cardiovascular risk factor except dyslipidemia. Participants were classified as normal‐weight (BMI < 25.0 kg/m 2 , n = 28) and high‐weight (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 , n = 72). Conventional echocardiographic parameters and two‐dimensional speckle tracking (2DSTE) were used to measure peak LA strain and global longitudinal strain to evaluate diastolic and systolic function, respectively. Result There was no significant difference in the standard and conventional echocardiographic parameters between the two groups. 2DSTE echocardiographic parameters of the longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium were not significantly different within the two groups. However, there were significant differences between the subjects with normal‐weight and high‐weight in terms of LA strain (34.51 ± 8.98% vs. 39.06 ± 8.62%, p = .021). The normal‐weight group had lower LA strain, in compression with the high‐weight group. All echocardiographic parameters were in the normal range. Conclusion In the present study we demonstrated that global longitudinal subendocardial deformations, for the evaluation of systolic function, and conventional echocardiographic parameters, for the evaluation of diastolic function, were not significantly different between normal‐ and high‐weight groups. Although LA strain was higher among overweight patients, it was not above the normal range of diastolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoroufian et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: