Why the study?
Does transoesophageal echocardiography improve diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making compared to transthoracic echocardiography in a district general hospital?
Does transoesophageal echocardiography improve diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making compared to transthoracic echocardiography in a district general hospital?
Transoesophageal echocardiography provides significant complementary diagnostic and management information over transthoracic echocardiography in a district general hospital setting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective TOE use in district hospitals; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
The aim of this study was to assess the value of a transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) service in a district general hospital (DGH). A series of 151 consecutive cases was analysed retrospectively to determine the relative additional benefit of TOE over transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in establishing diagnoses and making therapeutic decisions. Of the 151 cases, 140 were suitable for the two procedures to be compared. In 56%, TOE provided useful information for patient management. This consisted of the detection of new major findings (33%) and the exclusion of significant abnormalities (23%), suspected either clinically or by TTE. TOE made a minor clinical contribution in 8% of cases, while in 30% there was concordance between the two studies. Finally, in 6% both examinations were inconclusive. We conclude that TOE has a significant complementary role to TTE in terms of clinical diagnosis and patient management in the DGH setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fragakis et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: