Why the study?
The study investigated the correlation between cardiac function parameters measured by cardiac computed tomography and clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients to provide diagnostic data.
Are cardiac function parameters measured by cardiac CT associated with clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
Are cardiac function parameters measured by cardiac CT associated with clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
Cardiac CT-derived functional parameters, particularly LAEDVI, LVM, LVTEF, and LATEF, are significantly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF and may aid in risk stratification.
Background: This study investigated the correlation between cardiac function parameters by cardiac computed tomography (CT) and the clinical outcomes of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) to provide experimental data for the diagnosis of HFpEF. Methods: A total of 157 HFpEF patients admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into event and non-event groups according to the occurrence or absence of adverse events. Cardiac function parameters, such as the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), were obtained via CT scan. Also, the N-terminal-pro hormone b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients' serum were measured using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, and echocardiographic parameters such as LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) were also recorded. Further, Cox regression was employed to analyze factors associated with the clinical outcomes. Results: Compared with patients in the non-event group, the left ventricular end-diastolic mass (LVM), LVEDVI, left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), left atrial end-diastolic volume index (LAEDVI), and left atrial end-systolic volume index (LAESVI) were significantly increased, and the left ventricular total emptying fraction (LVTEF) and left atrial total emptying fraction (LATEF) were markedly decreased in the event group patients. Also, the E/e' and LAEDVI were related factors affecting the clinical outcomes of HFpEF patients. The above indicators displayed a significant predictive for the clinical outcomes of HFpEF patients. Conclusions: Several cardiac function measures, including LAEDVI, are factors associated with the clinical outcomes of HFpEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: