Why the study?
Real-world patterns of antiplatelet therapy often differ from guideline recommendations, and their implications for revascularization rates, rehospitalizations, and healthcare costs require evaluation.
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce rehospitalizations and healthcare costs in patients following acute coronary syndrome in a real-world setting?
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce rehospitalizations and healthcare costs in patients following acute coronary syndrome in a real-world setting?
In a real-world Italian ACS cohort, significant undertreatment with antiplatelet therapy was observed, which was associated with higher rates of rehospitalization and increased healthcare costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antiplatelet therapy post-ACS was associated with lower rehospitalization and costs; leaves open causal effects versus confounding in this observational cohort.
Background: Patterns of real-world antiplatelet therapy (APT) are reported to differ from guideline recommendations. This study describes patterns of APT during the year following a hospital diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and possible implications in terms of revascularization rates, rehospitalizations, and costs for the Italian National Health Service. Methods: From >5 million people, patients discharged (=index date) with primary/secondary ACS diagnosis in 2017 were identified by cross-linkage of administrative health data collected by the Ricerca e Salute (ReS) Foundation. Patients were characterized by revascularization rates at index date, APT at one month and one year (with appropriate coverage defined as ≥80% of defined daily doses), and rehospitalizations and healthcare costs during follow-up. Results: From the 2017 ReS database, 7966 (1.46 × 1000 inhabitants) were discharged alive with an ACS diagnosis. Most were >69 years and male. Of these, 83% (6640/7966) received ≥1 recommended antiplatelet agent within one month (treated group): 23% (1870/7966) as single and 60% (4770/7966) as dual APT. Among the 53% undergoing revascularization, 81% received dual APT at one month. Of the 78% with the same APT at one year, 66% showed appropriate coverage. For subjects treated and untreated with APT at one month, one-year rehospitalization rates were 54% and 66%, respectively, and mean per capita costs were EUR 14,316 and EUR 16,552, respectively (hospitalization driving >80% of costs). Conclusions: Among survivors of a hospitalized ACS diagnosis, this analysis shows relatively high APT under-treatment at one month and one year, associated with fewer index revascularization rates, more rehospitalizations, and greater costs. Further initiatives to understand undertreatment and poor adherence should lead to improved health management and savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calabria et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: