Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study compared sex-role stereotyping in British (N = 205) and New Zealand (N = 146) television advertisements. Following Harris and Stobart (1986), visually presented central figures were coded and analyzed independently of voice-over central figures. The attributes of visual central figures were classified into 72 categories based on previous studies (Furnham & Mak, 1999; McArthur & Resko, 1975) and thought to be sufficiently comprehensive: mode of presentation, age, credibility basis, role, location, argument, reward type, product type, product price, background, end comment and humor. The attributes of voice-over central figures were classified according to the categories of argument, reward type, product type, humor and end comment. The results of the analysis compared to other studies (Furnham & Bitar, 1993; Furnham & Skae, 1997) indicate that the extent of sex role stereotyping in Britain has declined over the past decade. The New Zealand data was found to be more heavily sex-role stereotyped than the British data, contrary to predictions. The findings of both analyses were considered in the light of previous research in North America, Britain and Australia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furnham et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: