Why the study?
The significance of patent foramen ovale in pulmonary embolism may be under-recognized, and right ventricular thrombus is a rare but significant complication with management implications.
This case highlights the importance of evaluating for patent foramen ovale and right ventricular thrombus in patients with pulmonary embolism, especially when presenting with atypical symptoms like arterial infarction.
May support thrombolysis plus anticoagulation for RV thrombus in PE; leaves open need for prospective validation of PFO closure timing.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that presents with a spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to hemodynamic instability. The early diagnosis in the emergency department is often challenging. Although the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and thromboembolic events in patients with PE is well-documented, the significance of the presence of PFO in patients with PE may be underrecognized. In addition, the occurrence of right ventricular thrombus (RVT) in PE is a rare but significant complication with implications for disease management. We report a case of acute-on-chronic PE with concurrent bilateral renal infarction due to a paradoxical embolus, alongside RVT. A 35-year-old male presented at our emergency department with complaints of sudden onset abdominal pain. Bilateral renal infarction was identified on a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Point-of-care ultrasound showed suggestive findings of PE and RVT. Subsequently, a pulmonary CT angiography confirmed bilateral PE, a PFO, and RVT. The patient was effectively managed with thrombolytic therapy, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on standby. This case highlights the need to recognize the diverse clinical manifestations of PE and the importance of considering coexisting PFO and RVT in affected patients. The diagnosis of PE can be complex when symptoms overlap with arterial thrombosis, such as renal infarction secondary to a PFO. In addition, RVT, although uncommon, is a serious complication in patients with PE that may require careful evaluation for thrombolytic or anticoagulant therapy. It is critical to consider the possibility of a PFO in all cases of PE, even in the absence of arterial embolism, and to promptly evaluate for RVT prior to initiating treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: