Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to devise a protective aid against bronchial obstruction induced by cold air, we have tested a breathing filter with heat and moisture exchanging properties. Nine asthma patients, who all had a history of cold-induced asthma, took part in exercise tests on an ergometer bicycle at a temperature of approximately -10 degrees C, without and with a breathing filter. Without a breathing filter, the maximum reduction in FEV1 was, on average, 36%. With the breathing filter, the maximum reduction in FEV1 was, on average, 11%. The difference was clearly significant (P < 0.001). A further five cold-sensitive asthmatics performed similar exercise tests at -10 degrees C on three occasions: 1) without and 2) with a breathing filter as above, and 3) with two breathing filters connected in parallel: one for inspiration and the other for expiration. Thus, no heat-moisture exchange could take place. The fall in FEV1 after provocation without a breathing filter and with parallel breathing filters was similar but attenuated when rebreathing took place through the breathing filter. The results confirm the theory that in cold/exercise-induced asthma, it is indeed the heat and/or water loss from the airways that triggers airway narrowing, and that a heat and moisture exchanging filter has a considerable protective effect and can be of value in the treatment of asthma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Millqvist et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: