Why the study?
Is it feasible to use Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to assess patient outcome and economic justification of treatment in an Intensive Care Unit?
Is it feasible to use Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to assess patient outcome and economic justification of treatment in an Intensive Care Unit?
The measurement of patient outcome using QALYs appears feasible in a general hospital ICU and suggests ICU treatment is economically justified compared to other medical interventions.
QALY assessment may prove feasible in general ICUs; leaves open its role in justifying treatment costs versus other interventions.
This study examines the feasibility of using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to assess patient outcome and the economic justification of treatment in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). 248 patients were followed for three years after admission. Survival and quality of life for each patient was evaluated. Outcome for each patient was quantified in discounted Quality-Adjusted Life Years (dQALYs). The economic justification of treatment was evaluated by comparing the total and marginal cost per dQALY for this patient group with the published cost per QALY for other medical interventions. 150 patients were alive after three years. Quality of life for most longterm survivors was good. Patient outcome (QALYs) was greatest for asthma and trauma patients, and least for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The tentative estimated cost-effectiveness of treatment varied from AUD $297 per QALY for asthma to AUD $2323 per QALY for patients with pulmonary oedema. This compares favourably with many preventative and non-acute medical treatments. Although the methodology is developmental, the measurement of patient outcome using QALYs appears to be feasible in a general hospital ICU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerridge et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: