Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The singly bonded dirhodium(II) complex, Rh2(dfpma)3Br4 (dfpma = bis(difluorophosphine)methylamine, CH3N(PF2)2), photoreacts when irradiated with UV or visible light. The mixed-valence LRh0RhΙΙX2 species, Rh2(dfpma)3Br2(L), is obtained quantitatively when THF solutions containing Rh2(dfpma)3Br4 and excess L = dfpma or PR3 are photolyzed (λexc > 436 nm). The photoreaction quantum yield is ∼10-2 over the near-UV absorption manifold, decreasing slightly as the excitation wavelength is extended into the visible region (φp313-405 = 0.022(3), φp436-468 = 0.012(1)). Continued irradiation with excitation wavelengths coincident with the absorption manifold of the LRh0RhΙΙX2 complex results in a second two-electron elimination reaction to give the LRh0Rh0L dimer, Rh2(dfpma)3L2, again in quantitative yield but with an attenuated quantum efficiency (φp313-365 = 0.0035(3), φp405-436 = 0.0017(3)). For photoreactions performed in THF, the bromine photoproduct is HBr, which may be trapped with 2,6-lutidine. NMR experiments reveal the production of 2 equiv of HBr for each two-electron transformation of the dirhodium photoreagent. The wavelength dependence of φp and the results of extended Hückel calculations are consistent with the photoreaction occurring from an excited state of dσ* parentage. The ability to preserve the same dσ* electronic structure across the four-electron series allows us to overcome the barriers traditionally associated with metal−halogen bond cleavage and consequently to design a four-electron photoreaction among discrete molecular species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heyduk et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: