Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation on selected health-related outcomes in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Does noninvasive auricular vagus nerve stimulation added to circuit weight training improve emotional eating, patient satisfaction, salivary cortisol, and body weight in individuals with metabolic syndrome?
Does noninvasive auricular vagus nerve stimulation added to circuit weight training improve emotional eating, patient satisfaction, salivary cortisol, and body weight in individuals with metabolic syndrome?
Adding noninvasive auricular vagus nerve stimulation to circuit weight training improves emotional eating, patient satisfaction, weight loss, and cortisol levels in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adding auricular VNS to circuit training improves emotional eating and weight loss in metabolic syndrome; extends vagal neuromodulation evidence to cardiometabolic populations.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on selected health-related outcomes in MetS. An Emotional Eating Scale (EES) and a Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) were used to evaluate emotional eating and patient satisfaction with their therapy, respectively. Salivary cortisol levels were measured between 8 and 9 am, and body weight was detected after 8 h of fasting. The clinical trial ID was NCT05785117. RESULTS: There was a significant change in EES and SAPS scale scores in both groups post-intervention; however, the study group showed higher scores than the control group. Furthermore, the change percentage of weight and salivary cortisol in the study group was 8.9% and 44.5%, respectively, which were higher than in the control group (2.9% and 40.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: VNS and CWT were considered promising, simple, and cost-effective interventions for improving emotional eating, patient satisfaction, salivary cortisol, and body weight in individuals with MetS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbanna et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: