Why the study?
Does the presence of the Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign (HMCAS) predict poorer clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Does the presence of the Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign (HMCAS) predict poorer clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
The Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign on initial CT is highly specific for MCA stroke and is associated with more severe initial deficits and poorer functional outcomes at 3-6 months.
HMCAS was associated with poorer functional outcomes after MCA stroke; hypothesis-generating for its independent prognostic value in risk stratification.
Background. The significance of the Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign (HMCAS) is uncertain. Aims. This prospective study investigated the sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, prognosis, interobserver variability, and associated clinical features of HMCAS in acute ischemic stroke. Methods. Initial CT scans of 117 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and 65 age-matched controls were reported independently by two neuroradiologists blinded to diagnosis. Details of initial stroke severity and comorbidities were collected, and outcome on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was assessed at 3–6 months. Results. HMCAS was seen in 15% of all ischemic strokes and 25% of all middle cerebral artery (MCA) strokes; specificity was 100%. HMCAS was associated with more severe initial deficit and atrial fibrillation. Only 21% of patients with a first-ever MCA stroke and HMCAS had a good outcome (mRS≤2) compared to 55% of those without the sign (P<0.001). Interobserver agreement was only 0.747 (Kappa statistic). Conclusion. The prevalence, specificity, sensitivity, and clinical associations of HMCAS were similar to previous reports. This study confirmed prospectively that HMCAS was associated with a poorer outcome at 3 to 6 months and demonstrated interobserver variability in detection of the sign.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aouad et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: