Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We describe the identification of linotte, a new autosomal gene in Drosophila involved with learning and memory. The linotte(1) mutant was derived from a PlacW transposan mutagenesis and was screened for three-hour memory deficits after classical conditioning of an olfactory avoidance response. Sensory and motor systems (olfactory acuity and shock reactivity) required for the classical conditioning experiments were normal in mutant linotte(1) files--indicating that the mutation disrupts learning/memory specifically. A chromosomal deficiency of the 37D region, where the linotte(1)P insert was localized in situ, failed to complement linotte(1)'s memory defect, and files from two lines homozygous for independent PlacW excisions show normal memory--indicating that the P insertion is responsible for the mutant phenotype. Additional behavior-genetic data suggest that linotte gene is non-vital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dura et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: