Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Co-creation in educational design and development is evolving and increasingly recognised as a vital component of contemporary nursing education. However, there remains a need to strengthen the knowledge base for this approach. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of empirical research on co-creation within nursing education and identify gaps in knowledge and areas requiring further investigation. METHODS: This study utilised a systematic scoping approach and followed a five-stage methodological framework: (1) identifying the research question; (2) selecting relevant studies; (3) choosing appropriate studies; (4) charting and organising the data; and (5) synthesising, summarising, and reporting the results. It searched the ERIC, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed databases to identify relevant articles, which then underwent double-blind screening, identifying 14 that met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. RESULTS: The analysis identified five themes that reflect the scope and nature of empirical research on co-creation in nursing education: (1) scarcity of studies and varied conceptualisation of co-creation, (2) dominance of digital educational co-creation initiatives, (3) underrepresentation of multidisciplinary collaboration in co-creation initiatives, (4) workshops as key activities of co-creative collaboration and engagement, and (5) paucity of knowledge on co-creation effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the need for more comprehensive research systematically examining the benefits, impacts, and facilitators of co-creation in nursing education. Future studies should incorporate the perspectives of multiple stakeholders, especially within clinical nursing education, and investigate the scalability of co-creation, including its costs and benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laugaland et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: