Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Most prior research on perceived procedural justice vis‐à‐vis human resource management selection procedures focuses on comparisons between nations and between types of employees. So far, findings indicate slight, if any, differences between nations. Predicated on a random sample of 950 respondents – native I sraelis and I sraelis from the former S oviet U nion – we find significant differences between the two groups concerning five selection methods, which we ascribe to inherent cultural dissimilarities. We attribute these differences to H ofstede's uncertainty avoidance dimension. These results may elicit increased focus on inherent cultural differences among potential employees with the view of considering these differences in opting for selection methods in order to accommodate for existing cultural differences. This consideration appears particularly pertinent in culturally diverse workforces, given the increased proportion of immigrants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brender‐Ilan et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: