The only viable explanations put forth to date for the glacial to interglacial change in atmospheric CO 2 content suggested from measurements of the CO 2 content of gas extracted from ice cores involve changes in the ocean's nutrient cycles. Any nutrient change capable of creating the 80 µatm changes in atmosphere CO 2 pressure suggested by the ice core results also creates significant change in the deep ocean's CO 3 = content. Evidence from deep sea sediments suggests that these CO 3 = changes are compensated on the time scale of a few thousand years by reductions or increases in amount of CaCO 3 accumulating in deep sea sediments. This compensation process has two important consequences. First, it significantly increases the magnitude of the CO 2 change per unit of nutrient forcing. Second, it causes a delay in the response of the atmospheric CO 2 change. While the first of these consequences is a boon to those seeking to explain the CO 2 change, the second may prove to be a curse. The ice core CO 2 record shows no evidence of a significant lag between the CO 2 response and the polar warming. In any case it is important that we improve our knowledge of the magnitude and timing of the CaCO 3 preservation events which mark the close of episodes of glaciation and of the dissolution events which mark the onset of these episodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Broecker et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: