Safety managers, practitioners, and researchers can employ different models for estimating and assessing hazards, consequences, likelihoods, risks, and/or mitigation measures in the safety field. The selection of a specific model may depend on the uncertainty associated with its estimation and its impact on the safety-related decision-making process. The recognition of this issue as an example of Algorithm Selection Problem (ASP) allows investigating the applicability of meta-learning principles that are scarcely adopted in the risk and safety literature. Consequently, we propose a novel meta-learning inspired framework to proactively rank a set of candidate models for Dynamic Risk Management (DRM) based on desired uncertainty conditions. We denominate this framework ProMetaUS (Proactive Meta-learning and Uncertainty-based Selection for dynamic risk management). To achieve this purpose, our meta-learning system acquires knowledge that relates the characteristics extracted both directly and indirectly from datasets (e.g. data-based, domain-based, simple and fast uncertainty-based, simple and fast sensitivity-based meta-features) to some performance measures of the models. Performance measures include confidence information, shape measurable quantities, safety decision criteria and threshold limits, and sensitivity analysis outputs. We tested the proposed framework in a case study about Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) assessment by means of @RISK. For each of the five datasets, single-performance measure rankings and a final ranking of the three models are generated. Such rankings are aggregated to obtain the global recommended ranking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefana et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: