Randomized trial demonstrates improved interprofessional learning strategies in health education, highlighting student and patient engagement.
Interprofessional learning (IPL) is required for health profession students to develop appropriate collaborative competencies. In 2024, in response to accreditation recommendations and evolving best practices, the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine & Health Sciences undertook a comprehensive redesign of its original IPL strategy. Guided by Kotter's eight-step model for organizational change, an interprofessional leadership team of academic staff, student, and patient partners reviewed and updated their approach to IPL. This new strategy integrates formal, informal, and workplace-based learning opportunities for all students, with learning outcomes aligned to the 2023 IPEC core competencies. An IPL logo was collaboratively designed to signpost all interprofessional activities and communicate the new vision. There is now an increased focus on workplace learning and embedding IPL into both curricula and co-curricula domains of the learning environment, with faculty development organized by a centralized team. Early success includes patient participation in all strategic decisions, appointment of a Deputy Dean interprofessional leadership role, new workplace learning activities, and elevating the vision of IPL at a local and national level through conference presentations, workshops, and with student engagement initiatives. This report outlines our process, rationale, and early outcomes, with the aim of demonstrating the merit of using an organizational management process when seeking curriculum transformation within a large education institution. This approach reinforces the recognized importance of leadership, stakeholder engagement, and sustained institutional support in fostering a cultural recognition and valuing of IPL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: