Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent survey validation studies suggest that measurement error in earnings data is pervasive and violates classical measurement error assumptions, and therefore may bias estimation of cross-section and longitudinal earnings models.We model the structure of earnings measurement error using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Validation Study (PSIDVS).We then use Rubin's (1987) multiple imputation techniques to estimate consistent earnings equations under nonclassical earnings measurement error in the PSID.Our technique is readily generalized, and the empirical results demonstrate the potential importance of correcting for measurement error in earnings and related data, particularly during recessions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brownstone et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: